Low specs experience v4 download torrent

'There's a lot of memory so we might as well grab a bunch whether we actually need it or not.' So working-as-designed, with a design based on poor assumptions. With 16 GB RAM, the auto setting results in up to 400-something MiB RAM being used for disk cache. The most we can do is add an entry to the FAQ or is the relevant libtorrent code, that determines how much RAM is used for disk cache when set to auto. The users who want to reduce the memory footprint can always manually set a smaller value than what auto decides for their machine. Plus, remember that 400 MiB extra RAM usage on a 32+ GiB system makes much less difference than an extra 100 MiB in a 1 or 2 GiB system.

It would force us to use the lowest-common denominator and go for something like 64 MiB, which is a performance bottleneck for many, which was the entire reason why the setting was changed to auto anyway.ДЇor now, I think the excessive RAM usage due to auto cache for 32+ GiB users (although already on 16 GiB it's a little too much) is an acceptable trade-off to ensure it's never the bottleneck for anyone, and to ensure that for most people (1-16 GiB), the value is adequate. there isn't a single acceptable value to cover the whole 1 GiB - 16 GiB spectrum.incentivizes users to change it to ridiculous values like 1+ GiB (I think it's a psychological thing) without really understanding how that will impact the memory usage and that such values are useless.Side note: I don't want to go back to hard-coded values because that: Though hopefully, this could be the last time that's needed before libtorrent 2.0 is released and qbittorrent adopts it. The problem with this is obviously that the formula needs to be extended every time a bigger amount of RAM becomes commonplace. for >= 16 GiB, divide by 60 or something, 32 and above divide by 80 or 90 or something, etc. As for the fact that the auto size starts to get a little too big for people with 16 or 32 GiB of RAM, the logic could be tweaked in libtorrent to account for that until 2.0 is What would be the downsides of hard-capping the cache at 256 MiB (or maybe 300 or even 400), when set to auto? If it is adequate for all but the most extreme use cases/system setups, it could be the way to go.ДЄlternatively, the same pattern of dividing by some constant could be used, e.g. Will be no good solution for this problem until libtorrent 2.0.

Low specs experience v4 download torrent